Staying elusive in the streets

Banksy
Banksy. Photo by Klara Kim.

Being an elusive figure in the graffiti/street art world is slowly becoming obsolete. Artists find themselves making the transition from anonymity to the limelight, for what many think is solely for profit. The proliferation of social media has amplified the audience of street art, and led to increased exposure and opportunities for artists. But what motivates street artists to step away from their elusive lifestyles?

Recently, it seems many graffiti writers have cast away their incognito identities and made the transition towards becoming legitimate artists. What was once considered an act of vandalism is now commissioned by brands and displayed in art galleries around the world. But in order to market themselves as legitimate, recognizable artists they need to step away from their personas and present themselves not as vandals, but as artists.

At one point, street artists in question would mask their voices and hide their faces behind a blurred out lens in order to keep their identities hidden to the general public during interviews. Now, all that smoke and mirrors are gone. Personally, I used to love D*Face. He was strictly recognized by his moniker and nothing else, with his face always blurred during interviews. Then, seemingly overnight, it all changed. He began to create work and appear in interviews under his real name. Suddenly, D*Face became Dean Stockton. His work became mild and denotative. His mythical qualities as an artist were diminished. He just didn’t seem as interesting.

So why make that transition? Why not stay hidden and attempt to make a living while staying private? Artists such as Kaws and Shepard Fairey could easily have stayed elusive, but now they’re the biggest names in the street art world. When Kaws started hijacking billboards and bus shelter ads, no one knew who he was. They only knew him by his name. Now he’s making vinyl toys, taking part in the Macy’s Thanksgiving parade, and getting interviewed by Pharrell Williams. Similar tale with Fairey: he started out pasting up stickers around his local skate park, nobody knew what Obey meant, but it was everywhere, so it must have been important. Fairey stepped out of the shadows and now, a decade later has his own clothing line and his face is one of the most recognizable in the street art world. Why? Artists realize that in order to market their art, they need to market their persona first. Is this the process of selling out?

But then there are the ones that stay elusive, the purists of the street art world, artists like Dain and Bäst. Born and raised in Brooklyn, the elusive Dain creates sublime works of art the merges old Hollywood glam with new age colors in their composition. This, along with his roots in graffiti, creates a gritty yet delicate street art style that is all his own. There was a weird video that came out a while back about Dain, starring someone other than Dain portraying him. It followed around an old guy as he talked about his life and art and all of his inspirations while answering questions from the camera man. At this point, we know that Dain isn’t really the old man (notice his pasting skills), but one can only assume that the video was meant as a marketing tool, for people to get on the Dain bandwagon and spread his name out to the public without ever being seen. But apart from that video, Dain has never really been a public artist but his works will always be deemed as some of the best of our generation.

Dain. Photo by Sabeth718.
Dain. Photo by Sabeth718.

Bäst plays his part really well. Brooklyn-based artist Bäst has been wheat-pasting throughout New York’s urban landscape for over a decade now. Bäst has remained an elusive character that has rarely been seen in public and whose very existence has been debated. There are very few video interviews where you can hear Bäst talk. The only interview that comes to mind was for the Deluxx Fluxx collaboration with Faile (which is, in my opinion, one of the best street art based collaboration to have ever happened). Bäst manages to frequently collaborate with Faile, who are not anonymous artists, but apart from that, he’s a pretty elusive guy that keeps producing on a consistent basis. Sure, he had this weird, super small scale collaboration with an olive oil company, and the Marc Jacobs collaboration which confused pretty much everybody, since his art being displayed on a sweater for a highly lucrative brand could be seen as an uncharacteristic “sell out” move, but apart from that, he’s always stayed true to form and just stuck to street art.

I bring up Bäst and Dain not only because of the elusive nature, but because they are in fact brothers. One can only assume that some sort of pact was made between them to stay pretty much anonymous to most social groupings. Sure they might have ulterior motives, but as long as they stay elusive, we’ll really never know.

Bast. Photo by Sabeth718.
Bäst. Photo by Sabeth718.

And of course, one has to mention Banksy or as we know him now, most likely Robin Gunningham. Regardless of his moniker, he helped cement street art’s place in the established art world. Street art fans will forever have a love/hate relationship with Banksy. At this point, his work can come off as banal and obvious, but the fact that his identity was questioned for so long, in our surveillance culture, is pretty significant. He got his art up in the Met, or someone posing as him did. He got in and out of Disneyland without getting caught. Banksy’s evasiveness lends him a mystique and fascination, but he still manages to profit from his art.

These are the kind of question that people ask themselves when artists stay anonymous. We question everything about them, not knowing what they’ll do next. Suspense and curiosity will always play a part in their persona. Their anonymity is what keeps us interested; it plays a part in how we perceive them. Take these qualities away, and we realize that these artists are just like the rest. Would Banksy of reached this kind of popularity if he was just Robin Gunningham all along? Of course not. But he’s also a unique case; it’s hard to imagine a street artist will ever achieve what he has in our life time. So why stay elusive? Well, I guess it’s a question at the core of street art. Artists are supposed to be a hooded, hidden characters putting art up illegally, leading people to ask questions. How did it get there? Who did it? Why did they do it? When it comes to people like Kaws and Shepard Fairey, they answer these questions in the interviews that they partake in. But for others, maybe we’ll never know.

Photos By sabeth718 and Klara Kim

Banksy mourns Nekst and a community mourns a Banksy

nekst
Screenshot of Banksy’s website

Banksy‘s website was updated recently with an animated tribute to Nekst, a very talented internationally recognized graffiti writer who died last year. The screenshot above gives you the basic idea of Banksy’s tribute, but you can see the piece in action on his website. This is the first update we’ve gotten from Banksy in a little while. I think the last street pieces he put on his site were the Olympic-theme pieces from last July.

7513216468_65f3f9d931_z
Banksy in London. Photo courtesy of Banksy.

In other Banksy-related news, the above Banksy piece was recently removed from the streets of London and put up for auction in Miami at Fine Art Auctions. The piece, of course not authenticated by Pest Control but is pretty clearly by Banksy seeing as it’s on his website. The BBC has more about the removal of the piece. At this point, the legality of the removal is unclear, but the community is certainly disappointed. That same auction also includes another street piece, Wet Dog, which was painted in Bethlehem and was removed a while ago (it was also featured at the Context art fair in Miami last year, supposedly not for sale at the time).

Screenshot and photo from Banksy.co.uk

Weekend link-o-rama

Kid Acne
Kid Acne at Village Underground in London

Sorry for the late link-o-rama. Caroline came to visit on Thursday, so I’ve been trying to stay offline.

Photo by HowAboutNo!

Art – Substance = ?

5422575202_3bcd4b1ebe_z
Alec Monopoly. Photo by savagecats.

Note from the editor: This is a guest post by Nico Glaude, who will hopefully be contributing more to Vandalog in the future. – RJ Rushmore

RJ tweeted this a few days ago “Alec Monopoly is in the latest issue of @JuxtapozMag. Seriously? Come on Evan. I know you’re better than that!” Which got me thinking; what exactly is going on to the state of street art culture? For those that don’t know, Alec Monopoly is a street artist who “lightly” appropriates the Mr. Monopoly character in the streets, sometimes he’s playing a keyboard or even playing the turntables. His interior work follows the same guidelines of appropriation; Mr. Monopoly on canvas either pasted with monopoly money or news paper articles related to the economic state of the U.S. The point of it all? Maybe there is none.

Alec Monopoly
Alec Monopoly. Photo by Birdman.

Meaningless art is something that will always plagued the art world, and most definitely plays it’s part in the streets. Yes there will forever be the debate of subjectivity, but let’s just be closed minded for a minute and examine things. What’s make Alec’s art pointless? The lack of effort in it all, the irony of taking on the economic state as a message, yet selling his art for thousands upon thousands of dollars. There’s no sense of real purpose or substance in his work, no evolution. If you take a minute to think about it, the same can be said about countless other “artists” who are getting rewarded even though they’re in a constant state of mediocrity.

Another case of substance abuse can be latched on to Curtis Kulig’s overly redundant “Love Me” campaign. It’s grown from a simple tag to becoming nothing more than a brand. In terms of marketing, it’s pretty genius, but at what point does it not become art anymore? Like with Alec’s work, Kulig’s work doesn’t evolve, what once had some substance, is now replaced with something that is lost in the world of pure redundancy. “Love Me” is now found on tee-shirts, skateboards, and sneakers. The slogan has become meaningless because the message is gone. It’s now become simply a marketing tool. Maybe, that’s all it ever was.

The point to all of this? Well just like Alec’s and Kulig’s art, maybe there is none. Yes meaningless art will forever be inescapable, this article won’t change that, and as I mentioned Alec and Kulig are only two cases of many. But we, as a culture, need stop validating such pointless attempts at attention, and realize that it is simply that, artists trying to get noticed by pawning off pretentious, uninspiring and empty art.  This fact will be true until the end of time, but we need to stop letting artists off so easy, stop granting them a “Get out of jail free” card, and make them realize that in order to gain our attention,they need to start making art that isn’t so meaningless.

Photos by savagecats and Birdman

Weekend link-o-rama

"Órbita" by David de la Mano and Pablo S. Herrero. Click to view the full piece.
“Órbita” by David de la Mano and Pablo S. Herrero. Click to view the full piece.

Slow week, but that doesn’t mean nothing good happened. Here’s some of it…

  • Love this drawing by Pixote.
  • It seems that Hrag Vartanian was not a big fan of Les Ballets De Faile, Faile’s project with the New York City Ballet. Personally, I really liked to the project. Yes, Hrag is right in pointing out that people were expecting more (like Faile having involvement with set design and costumes), but what Faile did do was, I think, a major success. Nine artists out of ten would have seriously messed up this sort of collaboration by not striking the right balance between completely ignoring the setting and embracing it too much. Ignore the setting, and the work could just have been shown anywhere and would have looked out of place. Go too far in trying to bend the work to the situation, and the artists’ essence is lost and the whole thing comes off as a cheesy joke. Faile struck just the right balance. There was a lot of classic Faile, mixed in with some new ballet-inspired imagery, but the ballet-inspired imagery didn’t look out of place at all. Faile’s work has always had a mix of grit and classical beauty, that ballet with their spin fit perfectly into that. I’ve got to disagree with Hrag on another point and say that I thought the work looked like it fit in just as well as anything else in the theater, particularly the massive “Tower of Faile” piece.
  • Thoughts on Crummy Gummy? I’m not sure what I think. Another Mr. Brainwash-inspired derivative artist who never needs to be mentioned again, or actually kinda funny?
  • Zoer has a new print out.
  • Kid Acne made some scarves that are now for sale with his “art fag” character on them.
  • The British Zeus had a solo show open this week at London’s Graffik Gallery. It’s open through the 21st.
  • Ever wanted to design a t-shirt using D*face’s logo? Now you can, and you can win $500 and a print for your efforts.
  • Great new piece by Seacreative.
  • It’s exciting to see strong murals going up in South Delhi, India.

Photo courtesy of David de la Mano and Pablo S. Herrero

Over on Complex.com… 10 artists using the internet like the street

Art and photo by Lush
Lush

Occasionally I write pieces for Complex.com. This week, they published piece of mine called 10 artists using the internet like the street. List posts can be entertaining, but I wouldn’t normally say that I’m proud of my list posts. This particular piece is different though. It’s a list of visionary artists doing game-changing work that blurs or even completely ignores any lines that exist between the street and the internet. These are the artists I’m writing about right now in the book that I’ve mentioned here from time to time. So consider this post a little teaser of what I’ve been thinking about lately, and what I’ll be writing about in great detailing in the future.

Please check out the post, because I think these artists are doing really important work, and I’d love to get your thoughts on what they are doing. Maybe I’m onto something here, or maybe you think I’m on the completely wrong path. Either way, I’d like your input. So, go check out 10 artists using the internet like the street and let me know what you think by leaving a comment on this post or over at Complex.com, emailing me, or tweeting me.

Thanks.

Photo by Lush

Weekend link-o-rama

Overunder
Overunder

Sorry I missed the link-o-rama last week. Was having a fantastic birthday in NYC. Thanks to everyone who came out to say hello.

  • I just picked up the recent Troy Lovegates book (now sold out), and I wish I could pick up this print as well. Absolutely beautiful stuff.
  • Nice little Pink Floyd-themed stencil by Plastic Jesus.
  • Interesting JR-esque posters in UK mines.
  • Philippe Baudelocque in Paris.
  • Judith Supine on being bored with street art.
  • Leon Reid IV’s latest sculpture addresses the crushing personal debt of so many Americans.
  • Tova Lobatz curated a show at 941 Geary with Vhils, How and Nosm, Sten and Lex, and others.
  • Shepard Fairey released some prints using diamond dust, which is quite interesting. As the press release says, “Perhaps most famously used by Andy Warhol, who understood perfectly how to convey a message, Diamond Dust was used to add glamour, transforming ordinary images into coveted objects. The material aligns with Shepard’s work and interest in the seduction of advertising and consumerism. Diamond Dust, literally and metaphorically is superficial, applied to the surface of the print, the luminous effect is both beautiful and alluring.” But it’s one of those things that just gets me thinking about how the art world, much like capitalism, seems so good at absorbing critique and spitting at back out as product. People love the meaningless OBEY icon, so Shepard sells it. Shepard needs to make more product to continue selling to this market he has created, so he takes an old design (or a slight variant, I’m not positive), and adds meaningless diamond dust to it and sells it as something new. The best critiques participate in the system which they critique, but that’s a risky game to play. Of course, I say all this with a print by Shepard hanging on my wall.
  • OldWalls is a project where the photographer took photos of graffiti in the early 1990’s and recently returned to those spots to take the exact same shots, and then each matching photo is displayed next to its counterpart.
  • Artnet’s latest street art and graffiti auction has a handful of interesting pieces (Artnet is a sponsor of Vandalog btw). Here are my favorites:

Photos by Luna Park

Street artist Bubo plagiarized art online for nearly a year

Today I discovered an artist who had spent the better part of a year plagiarizing the work of others by photoshopping his own name into photographs that he found online. That artist is from Oklahoma City and goes by the name Bubo. He was quite active on Twitter, with 1399 followers before he deleted his account earlier today. His website was also wiped clean around the same time, but I made sure to take screenshots before that happened. Bubo’s deception began to unravel when my friend Wayne brought his work to my attention. I had a look at Bubo’s website and it was immediately clear that things were not right.

SPQR
Work by SPQR attributed to Bubo on his website. Note the “Bubo” signature added to the piece.

In the “walls” section of his site, Bubo had 13 photographs of different piece of street art. The work was of varying styles, from photorealistic to 1-layer stencils. And a lot of it looked familiar. I identified 5 pieces that could not be by Bubo, and one that was highly unlikely, with most of the rest being quite suspect as a result. With some quick Googling, I found that Bubo had put work on his website by SPQR, L.E.T., Priest, David Zinn, and Joe Iurato, as well as this unattributed piece which seemed unlikely to be by an artist who I already knew was stealing at least some of the work posted on his website. You can see the SPQR piece above, and the other pieces here, here, here, here, and here. Bubo added a small stenciled signature to some, but not all, of the photographs on his site. He also tweeted some of the works as his own, as shown here and here.

Thanks to another one of his tweets, shown below, I was able to determine that Bubo was also not the artist behind the unattributed piece that I recognized (does anyone know the artist? Is it maybe OaKoAk?). After all, the piece was posted to Nuart’s blog and Wooster Collective in 2011, so it was clearly not Bubo’s if he was claiming the work was “new” in November 2012.

spongbob tweet

This evening, I spoke with Bubo over Skype. He immediately came clean to me admitting that his website was full of other artists’ work. Bubo explained that some of the work on the site was his own (4 of 13 pieces in the walls section), but that he began passing of other work as his when he received negative reactions to his own pieces and positive reactions when he post other people’s work.

Bubo sounded genuinely remorseful and was very clear that he understood that what he had done was wrong. At times it sounded like he was practically in tears. He made almost no attempt to justify his actions. I asked Bubo why he would put his name on another artist’s work. He said, “I thought that if I did that, it would make [people] like mine I guess and draw more attention to my own stuff. That’s really it.”

Bubo also apologized to all the artists whose work he passed off as his own, many of whom he does know the names of, saying, “I’m very very very very remorseful, I’m very sorry to those guys because that was their shit. They put their life into it. It came from their mind, their hand, all of that. and I took it.”

After our conversation, he wrote this confession/apology/explanation…

I guess you know by now that the only thing that I told the truth about was my health. That is no lie but it’s my fault, I did it to myself and I deserve it. This was supposed to be bubo’s summer, I worked for about 8 months straight on the road and saved every penny that I could. I saved right at $16,000 and came home to okc to tear the place up but I got into drugs and it ruined me. That stupid fake weed shit, I was doing about 8-9 grams of it a day and I think it gave me my cancer but I can’t prove it, no one can. Nobody even knows what’s in the stuff, just nasty chemicals…

My first piece that I put out was the stupid walmart piece but everyone hated it. I tried the BP piece next but I got the same reaction. I thought that if I put that stuff directly on their property that it would be better but it didn’t matter. I wanted friends so bad in this world that I stole other people’s art to get them. I don’t have any friends, none that truly care about me anyway and I’m sick of being alone. The first piece I stole was the “eye” piece. People loved that one and I got many followers from it. I had people talking to me now and I couldn’t stop doing it. I have been alone for a long time now due to something else that happened to me a number of years ago.

I loved the attention and just talking to people. That’s really all it was about, I just wanted people to like me but I went about it the wrong way. I still can’t believe that it has gone on so long and that RJ is the only one to ever say anything to me. I’m sure other people knew as well but they chose to remain silent about it.

I had an awesome job but my drug use ruined that for me. I have cleaned up but have gotten myself so far down that I can’t pay for gas to get back & forth from work.

I have made several mistakes over the last year and I give you my word, I will be paying for them.

I want to say to the Artist’s whose work I stole, I apologize, very deeply. Your work means the world to you and I messed with that pretty hard. I will never in my life ever do this again, not in any way, shape, or form. I swear that to you and I offer you this consolation: The entire time I was stealing from you, I was slowly committing suicide and didn’t even know it until it was to late…:)

bubo

I’m not sure how much of that story is true about Bubo getting cancer from a drug habit that distracted him from his goals of making his own art, but I do believe that he is sorry. Maybe it’s true or maybe it’s not, but what I’m pretty sure of is that Bubo is a pretty desperate and confused guy who just wanted to fit in and maybe get a piece of the street art pie. I don’t think he is an evil genius who set out to manipulate people or become the next Mr. Brainwash through some complex scheme without creating his own work. I think he just got up for a bit and then made some very serious mistakes that he kept making when he saw that he was rewarded for them. The work that Bubo was doing that was his own wasn’t bad. It wasn’t great, but he had the potential to become a solid artist if he just worked at it. Maybe he would have been one more in a sea of Banksy clones, but that’s not the worst place in the world to be. At least, it’s a hell of a lot better place to be than a plagiarist.

Bubo's twitter profile moments before being deleted
Bubo’s twitter profile moments before being deleted

What makes something like this even possible? What makes someone think it is okay even for a second? Bubo’s career is kind of amazing in a very wrong way. When he shut down his Twitter account, he had 1399 followers, and he was having conversations with those people every day. Sometimes he would post photos to Twitter claiming them to be his own work, and of course his profile had a link to his website with all of the plagiarized pieces. And yet, nobody called him out. He had been at it for a year. It wasn’t just street art either. He was posting paintings on Twitter and his website that he did not make. How could nobody have seen this? Much of the work that Bubo stole had appeared on major blogs like Wooster Collective. Or, if people had noticed what Bubo was doing, how could they have stayed silent? Even Bubo seems amazed that he was able to keep going for so long.

I’ll admit that it seems that a community willing to criticize Bubo’s actual work may have been one of the contributing factors to his initial plagiarism, but I think that an overly-congratulatory and self-promotional street art community contributed to Bubo being able to pull of his deception for so long. On Twitter, artists who follow back and retweet every last positive mention of themselves inevitably leads to people following them and saying positive things about their work. Sometimes, the street art world, particularly over twitter, can be a big circlejerk. And in that circlejerk, nobody is going to question another artist’s work unless they absolutely know for a fact that it has been stolen, and maybe not even then. Perhaps if the street art community was generally more to giving and receiving constructive critiques, these kinds of things would not go on for so long.

The nature of the internet played role too. Since Bubo was posting photos online and he is based in Oklahoma City, where there aren’t many people going around photographing street art on their lunch breaks like in NYC, nobody seems to have questioned him about where exactly his works were located. He could post photos without any serious concern that someone might try to track down the work to see it in person.

And why would Bubo think his plagiarizing was okay or get any joy out of it? For the joy part, again, I think it goes back to the way that the street art community can be extremely supportive and positive to the point where it is detrimental sometimes. In addition to the drugs, Bubo seems to have become addicted to the modest fame that he had achieved and the fan-base he built up. In our Skype conversation, Bubo gave some insight into how he rationalized his actions. He said, “This is a fact. If you look at all of these people. Every single one of them steals people’s shit. Half of these millionaire artists out there, they don’t even do their own stuff anymore. And that’s a fact. So who’s the really bad person? I mean, they’re the ones making money off of it.” But there’s an obvious and crucial difference between Jeff Koons or Shepard Fairey appropriating work and employing assistants and what Bubo did: Those artists never lied to anyone. Everybody knows that Koons and Fairey employ paid assistants to help execute their work, and appropriation is part of the conceptual basis for some of what they do, not usually something that they try to hide. Bubo took others’ work and posted it as his own with no such conceptual component. Bubo just wanted to get more fans and be loved for the work he was posting as though he had thought-up and executed it himself.

While Bubo was able to go plagiarizing for nearly a year, he was eventually caught red-handed with only minimal investigation on my part. And I suppose that’s thanks to the internet too. If he were in Oklahoma City and just showing the plagiarized work to people there in handmade zines 20 years ago, he could still be at it (although then the question becomes how he would get access to the photos that he edited in the first place). So if you’re thinking about emulating Bubo or you already are, keep in mind that it’s only a matter of time before it all comes crashing down. And if you know of an artist doing anything like this, please, do not let it continue. Call them out on their lies. Stealing and re-attributing artwork may seem harmless at first, but plagiarism is unfair and potentially detrimental to the artists being plagiarized. For more stories like this, just check the blog You Thought We Wouldn’t Notice.

I would love to get other people’s thoughts on Bubo’s story in the comments section, particularly if your work was stolen by Bubo or you were a victim of his deception.

Here are links to the pieces that Bubo plagiarized that I was able to trace to a source:

Screenshots by RJ Rushmore, photo of the BP piece by Bubo, but I’m not sure how to appropriately credit the photos within the screenshots.

Weekend link-o-rama

Ankles
Ankles

Back to school on Tuesday. Actually, I’m okay with that. And of course, it means more time blogging because it means more time procrastinating. Here’s some of what we missed this week while Caroline and I were on vacation:

Photo by Ankles

Weekend link-o-rama

8329983957_59611f61ba_z

Okay Christmas and new years are over. Let’s get back to real life.

Photo by Jake Dobkin