Adam Neate: A New Understanding

Posted: October 18th, 2009 | Author: | Category: Gallery/Museum Shows | Tags: | 5 Comments »

Adam Neate

As far as I’m concerned, Adam Neate is one of the best painters of a generation. From what I’ve been hearing on and off the record, his recent solo show at Elms Lesters in London has been getting very mixed reviews. Many people are saying he is even more brilliant than before, others feel vindicated for criticizing his pricing now that the hype seems to have died down, some fans are just confused and disappointed.

I have the give the show a pretty average review myself. This was the show I was looking forward to most this year, as much as Banksy versus The Bristol Museum. And yet, in the end, it wasn’t at all what I was expecting or hoping for.

Like I said, Adam is an amazing painter, and I’d like to see anybody try and convince me that’s not true. But Adam likes to keep changing his work and challenging himself with his painting. Sounds like a good thing, but it means that this show lacks many of the element that I enjoyed so much in Adam’s older work. The ground floor of A New Understanding has paintings that, though recognizably Adam’s, progress in painterly skill but have lost the raw power of previous work.

Adam Downstairs

Now, those paintings are beautiful, they tell a story, they are well painted, but to me they are boring. Yes, in the painting on the right, Adam has stuck a real umbrella into the painting, and in both of those paintings there are very cool shadows, but that’s technically interesting and nothing else. I know people who would love to have these paintings in their homes: my contemporary art collector friends. They might be interested in these. And that’s what I thought about this entire floor. Good paintings for people who enjoy fine art and contemporary art. But not one of these paintings truly reached me and touched my soul like I expected. None of them gave me that feeling that a truly great painting is supposed to give you, and that much of Adam’s older work did give me.

But upstairs feels like a completely different show.

Adam

About half the work upstairs is something along these lines. Adam Neate is trying to create “4D” pieces that show the passage of time. Working with perspex, he has a unique way of creating lines of motion and showing blurs. It doesn’t work every time, but it does work sometimes and the development really brings his work forward.

Adam

Adam Neate

These two portraits are immediately identifiable as Adam Neate’s work, and are probably the sort of thing that people work expecting, but they also both use perspex in an innovative way to show motion. These are probably my favorite pieces in the show.

Pop Adam

And these are the lower price point paintings. These are interesting, because they are again pretty identifiable as Neate’s work, but they incorporate some of the motion elements of other pieces in A New Understanding and they use much bolder colors than most people would expect from Adam. The colors and repeated image in the paintings immediately reminded me of Warhol, not something I would have expected at this show at all, but cool nonetheless.

While A New Understanding isn’t what I had hoped for, I think the amazing thing about Neate is how quickly his work changes. It seems like every show, almost every piece, that he does is important because Adam might never do something like it again. Even within this show, there are at least 2 distinct periods of work. Also, Adam is such a talented painter that I know this is the kind of thing where even if this show doesn’t have much work to my taste, the next one might.

Just one more quick thought. It seems to me like Adam has officially crossed that invisible and ill-defined line between street/urban artist and “contemporary painter” or whatever. His old work always had a feel to it like the street was still on his mind, and the work appealed to street art collectors, but with this new show, there is no doubt that he can cross over into the more mainstream art world and gain a much more diverse collector base. This was not a street art show, it was an art show. And I don’t know if that’s a compliment, criticism or neither.

Photos by s.butterfly

Related posts:

  1. Next week: Solo show and book from Elbow Toe


  • http://Website Steven Shandy

    Its interesting to read this blog, because I think you you’re in touch with that distinctly English(London?) taste that sort of baffles me. I’ve always thought Neates work was like the worst looking thing imaginable; but the idea to leave them in vast quantities all over a city for people to pick up, was interesting. So the idea required speed- speed= what it looked like. But I’m beginning to think there’s a conscious race to the bottom? Like an attempt to claim all the rejected aesthetic ground? Sort of like LA “Lowbrow”; if anything “bad” exists, it must be worth something? I’d put Herakut, and Matt Small is this camp. All their work looks like things you see in a “craft market ” in a 3rd world country, where the science of hooking a response from lowest common denominator tourists develops over the decades, and the same “paintings” get bigger eyes, bigger tears, more “raw” exciting splatters. And the same market in the US, would include gadgets like perspex and bendable wires to amp the “sincere” brushstrokes to “beyond” levels of “artistic” gesture. Or perhaps I’m completely wrong, that would be very cool. I used to think David Choe was the same as the above, like a professional wrestler – loudmouth & water bloated muscles, boasting fake moves, but I’ve recently taken to his sense of humor at least. Anyway, Neates actual art, I dunno, is it more than a signature? That profile line for the head, the “sad” eye, repeat.

  • http://www.vandalog.com RJ

    Thanks Steven. Although I’m American, living in London has definitely given me a London-centric view of art.

    It surprises me that Americans don’t like Matt Small, Herakut or Adam Neate. I think they are all very talented and couldn’t disagree with you more. But your view seems pretty typical common in America. Matt and Adam have never shown in the USA, and Herakut is definitely more popular over here. Maybe it’s a cultural thing, or maybe just hype.

    I think Neate definitely does more than paint the same thing over and over. His 3d pieces made of cardboard are one example of how he changes up his work, and he has made great scenes with the 3d cardboard like The Arrest (http://www.flickr.com/photos/24552058@N07/2500450405/) which is much more than a simple portrait.

  • http://imagestoliveby.wordpress.com Alison

    Interesting review of the show, with some thought-provoking ideas. My comments aren’t based on a viewing of the show – I’ve had to make do with seeing the work online so far, sadly. But to me, one of the most interesting things about the works is how they seem to be referencing a different range of artists from his previous work: I look at the ‘downstairs’ images and I think of artists like Otto Dix or Tamara de Lempicka – the composition, the elegant lines, the vague sense of decadence evoked in the figures and groups. The ‘upstairs’ images make me think of Francis Bacon: intensely interesting to see how Bacon’s portraits could be evoked by such different techniques. Your evocation of Warhol is well-said; I hadn’t initially seen that, but you are bang-on. As for the limitations in the poses and expressions, yes, that’s probably correct, and it would be interesting to see Neate expand his range in that respect. But I also wonder – I saw the video interview with him in which he speaks of having had a bit of a breakdown recently: perhaps the ‘sad eye’ and the drooping head really do come out of a compulsive view upon the world and of himself…?
    Would art collectors like these works? Yes, I think you’re right, they would. Neate seems like Parla in many respects, moving into the world of ‘fine art’ rather than ‘street art’. I wonder if the fact that they are both represented by Elms Lesters has anything to do with this – for all that the gallery champions street art (and they ahve been very effective in doing so) they seem to do so within a very elegant, fine-art frame (for eg, all those gorgeous limited edition books), without any of the grit or grime of the street!
    Anyway, thanks for the posting on the show…

  • http://Website Stef

    This show has to be seen to be believed!
    For me the Jesus installation has propelled him onto another level.

  • http://www.vandalog.com RJ

    Yeah the Jesus installation was great. I hope to see more pieces like that from Adam.